From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [reverse] A "toy" implementation of reverse execution
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 20:42:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42A0C0B2.4040601@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42A0B5AD.1060401@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2012 bytes --]
And I forgot to attach my example. This contains a trace-frame
file for the testsuite/gdb.base/break.c program, with one frame
per instruction. Using the rda server and any x86 gdb you can
debug this forward and backward, by instruction or by source line.
Michael Snyder wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Here's a "toy" implementation of a target that can,
> to a very limited extent, act as if it's offering
> reverse execution to gdb. I hope it will be useful
> for trying out ideas. It should be useful for both
> the "bookmark" approach and the "reverse-stepi" method.
>
> What I've done is, starting from the "sample" program in RDA,
> I added the ability to understand "tfind" requests, and then
> added on a module that could read simplified tracepoint frames
> from a file, and then serve them back to gdb.
>
> Then I generated a trace frame file from the testsuite program
> "break.c", starting at main and saving a tracepoint for every
> instruction. It only took about 157 frames. ;-)
>
> Now, if I feed that file to my rda-derived trace frame server,
> "tfind next" becomes equivalent to "stepi", and "tfind prev"
> becomes equivalent to "reverse-stepi".
>
> With those as primatives, reverse-step turns out to be,
> to first approximation at least, fairly easy:
>
> define reverse-si
> tfind -
> end
>
> define si
> tfind
> end
>
> define unstep
> reverse-si
> set $foo=$trace_line
> while $foo==$trace_line
> reverse-si
> end
> si
> end
>
> As several of us speculated, the algorhythm for stepping backward
> involves first taking a backstep, then establishing the line range
> and stepping out of it, and finally taking one forward step.
>
> I've created a branch and checked in my modified rda, along with
> a hacked-up gdb that I'm using to help create trace frame files.
> The branch is "msnyder-tracepoint-checkpoint-branch", and y'all
> are welcome to play with it. There's a README-CHECKPOINTS file.
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: example.tar.gz --]
[-- Type: application/x-tar, Size: 12005 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-03 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-03 19:55 Michael Snyder
2005-06-03 20:42 ` Michael Snyder [this message]
2005-06-04 7:15 ` Soam Vasani
2005-06-06 6:00 ` Michael Snyder
2005-06-06 8:44 ` Soam Vasani
2005-06-04 23:11 ` Reversible GDB resources Dan Shearer
2005-06-09 19:32 ` Dan Shearer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42A0C0B2.4040601@redhat.com \
--to=msnyder@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox