From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18463 invoked by alias); 27 May 2005 10:43:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18447 invoked by uid 22791); 27 May 2005 10:43:35 -0000 Received: from miranda.se.axis.com (HELO miranda.se.axis.com) (193.13.178.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2005 10:43:35 +0000 Received: from [10.92.19.1] (ironmaiden.se.axis.com [10.92.19.1]) by miranda.se.axis.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-5local0.1) with ESMTP id j4RAh0Nc007716; Fri, 27 May 2005 12:43:00 +0200 Message-ID: <4296F9B6.10500@axis.com> Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 10:43:00 -0000 From: Orjan Friberg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Dwarf-2 unwinding vs. manual prologue analysis References: <4295E439.7070104@axis.com> <20050526150841.GA9804@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20050526150841.GA9804@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00346.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > No. If enabling the DWARF-2 CFI support causes things to break, then > you need to inspect your CFI; it is probably broken. You need to do > prologue analysis if there's anything without CFI that you need to > handle, which there usually is - for instance PLT stubs. Ah, now I see. The things that broke without any prologue scanning were indeed things like 'next' over library calls (PLT stubs) and things related to call dummys (callfuncs.exp). -- Orjan Friberg Axis Communications