From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23950 invoked by alias); 10 May 2005 08:38:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23862 invoked from network); 10 May 2005 08:38:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO andromeda.onevision.de) (212.77.172.62) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 10 May 2005 08:38:33 -0000 Received: from [192.168.5.120] (oppenheim.onevision.de [192.168.5.120]) by andromeda.onevision.de (8.13.1/8.12.9/ROSCH/DDB) with ESMTP id j4A8cWUt016359; Tue, 10 May 2005 10:38:32 +0200 Message-ID: <428072D8.80102@onevision.de> Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 08:38:00 -0000 From: Roland Schwingel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Kettenis , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdb stack trace problems (Addendum) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00131.txt.bz2 Hi... Mark Kettenis wrote on 08.05.2005 15:30:20: > Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 09:03:08 +0200 > From: Roland Schwingel > > Hi Mark... > > Have you already had some time to look into my results with your patch to > the i386 stack unwinder? At basically it could work but obviously it > is not advancing to the next stack frame... Attached you will find my > results > > This isn't very encouraging. My approach obviously isn't working very > well. My suggestion is to go for a Windows-specific solution, where > one would use a special unwinder for the sort of undebuggable code > that's found in the Windows system DLLs. But I'm afraid I can't > really do much since I don't have a Windows system. Chris, is there > any change you can hack something like this into i386-cygwin-tdep.c? Uff.... Sad to hear... Roland