From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-21308-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 363 invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2005 16:21:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 32149 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2005 16:21:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 28 Apr 2005 16:21:11 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j3SGLAtP020659
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 12:21:10 -0400
Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j3SGLAO22475;
	Thu, 28 Apr 2005 12:21:10 -0400
Received: from [172.16.50.70] (vpn50-70.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.70])
	by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j3SGLA1K023875;
	Thu, 28 Apr 2005 12:21:10 -0400
Message-ID: <42710D1F.1080808@gnu.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 06:19:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-1 (X11/20050323)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stan Shebs <shebs@apple.com>
CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: building with gcc 4?
References: <42646175.7040700@gnu.org> <426479E3.6040507@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <426479E3.6040507@apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00211.txt.bz2

Stan Shebs wrote:
> Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
>> Has anyone tried building GDB with GCC 4? (given the number of 
>> warnings I suspect not).  I'll try to wack this down.
> 
> 
> I have, but I've been preoccupied with the part where my
> attempted Darwin port is totally broken. :-)

I'll take that as a no.

As lead maintainers we're all expected to be building with -Werror. 
Thing is my newly upgraded m/c has GCC 4 as the default compiler, and 
GDB with GCC 4 gets so many warnings that -Werror is useless.  I guess 
it falls to me to fix this (it's going to hurt but it is good for you ...).