From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28680 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2005 19:43:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28611 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2005 19:43:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out4.apple.com) (17.254.13.23) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2005 19:43:23 -0000 Received: from mailgate2.apple.com (a17-128-100-204.apple.com [17.128.100.204]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j2MJhN3E009792 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:43:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay1.apple.com (relay1.apple.com) by mailgate2.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.17) with ESMTP id ; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:43:23 -0800 Received: from [17.112.104.219] ([17.112.104.219]) by relay1.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j2MJhLIO025692; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:43:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <42407558.4030503@apple.com> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:43:00 -0000 From: Stan Shebs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Roberts CC: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Product branches in the GDB repository? References: <20050322002034.GA19385@nevyn.them.org> <423F68A3.3090703@apple.com> <16959.33075.606023.632089@farnswood.snap.net.nz> In-Reply-To: <16959.33075.606023.632089@farnswood.snap.net.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00207.txt.bz2 Nick Roberts wrote: > > (Does that mean Apple GDB should get a branch here too? > > Interesting question...) > >In that case, do Apple intend to merge their changes with HEAD at some stage? >I am particularly interested in their changes to GDB/MI. > I can't speak for our future plans, but I personally would like to make it happen, and I recently got reassigned to debugger hacking, which gives us a 33% increase in our GDB hack power. So there's some reason for optimism. I currently have an FSF GDB sandbox that can read mach-o files and run programs, but haven't quite figured out how to make them stop. :-) Stan