From: Russell Shaw <rjshaw@netspace.net.au>
Cc: 'GDB' <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Is it possible to save breakpoints to a file?
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 11:58:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4232D9B3.9030900@netspace.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4232D267.10303@dsl.pipex.com>
RT wrote:
> Tom Tromey wrote:
>
>>>>>>> "RT" == RT <mfoc73@dsl.pipex.com> writes:
>>
>>>> If you are using the insight GUI for gdb, that will save your
>>>> breakpoints
>>>> for you as part of the project preferences. It writes them into
>>>> .gdbinit
>>>> automatically and reloads them next time you're debugging the same
>>>> executable.
>>
>> RT> Which makes life rather difficult if you have a break set in a shared
>> RT> library. If you reply 'yes' by mistake when Insight asks if you want
>> RT> to make the break pending on the library load, then gdb will rapidly
>> RT> crash.
>>
>> I don't know if this is in the gdb bug database; it should be.
>
> I haven't looked at this in detail. I suspect the problem is that
> Insight is no longer actively maintained, and so it's difficult to get a
> version of insight that uses the current gdb.
>
> There's no point filing bugs that are Insight-specific; there's no one
> to work on them. A trivial licensing problem has lead to gdb having no
> usable GUI (that I know of, anyway; and I've used both ddd and insight).
> If anyone at the FSF knows of a way to debug multi-threaded
> shared-library apps without a GUI, then I'd be really pleased to hear
> from them. And, if I don't hear from them, I guess that they'll agree
> that gdb is an 80's dinosaur, and it's time to put it to bed.
What is the licencing problem? I've been going to make a new gui for
gdb, but i'm busy with too much other stuff.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-12 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-10 10:52 Atul Talesara
2005-03-10 15:08 ` Kris Warkentin
2005-03-10 15:52 ` Dave Korn
2005-03-10 16:08 ` RT
2005-03-11 1:28 ` Tom Tromey
2005-03-12 11:29 ` RT
2005-03-12 11:58 ` Russell Shaw [this message]
2005-03-12 12:13 ` RT
2005-03-12 19:39 ` Tom Tromey
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-13 5:03 Paul Schlie
2005-03-10 7:07 Hareesh Nagarajan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4232D9B3.9030900@netspace.net.au \
--to=rjshaw@netspace.net.au \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox