Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hareesh Nagarajan <hnagaraj@cs.uic.edu>
To: GDB <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Cc: Kris Warkentin <kewarken@qnx.com>
Subject: Re: Unable to find dynamic linker breakpoint function.
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 20:20:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <421F7E59.7020400@cs.uic.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <421F2714.40103@qnx.com>

Kris Warkentin wrote:
> I think you're seeing two different problems here but they may have the 
> same root.  Gdb may be finding the wrong glibc - that is, not the same 
> one that the program is using.  Try 'info shared' to see what gdb is using.

I don't know how 'info shared' helps, but this might:

hareesh: hareesh/ $ ldd new
         linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0xffffe000)
         libstdc++.so.5 => 
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.4/libstdc++.so.5 (0xb7f0d000)
         libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0xb7eeb000)
         libgcc_s.so.1 => 
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.4/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xb7ee2000)
         libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb7dce000)
         /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7fea000)

I have compiled libstdc++ with '-g -fomit-frame-pointer'.

Additionally, I use Gentoo Linux and that this problem of mine affects 
debugging member functions of C++ STL containers. So how could the wrong 
glibc be the problem?

> As far as the stop goes, string::at(2) may have been inlined in which 
> case the breakpoint may well be in that code.  You might want to look at 
> the assembly.  Try breaking on seven, nexting to 8 and see if you get 
> the same result.  Or clear the breakpoint before calling x.at(2).  

I did that. But that doesn't change anything as can be seen below.

Breakpoint 1, main () at new.cc:7
7               string x("heloo");
(gdb) n
8               cout << x.at(2);
(gdb) inspect x.at(2)

Breakpoint 1, main () at new.cc:7
7               string x("heloo");
The program being debugged stopped while in a function called from GDB.
When the function (std::string::at(unsigned) const) is done executing, 
GDB will silently stop (instead of continuing to evaluate the expression 
containing the function call).

I have no idea how to fix this problem and it is frankly driving me mad!

Thanks,

Hareesh


  reply	other threads:[~2005-02-25 19:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-25  8:04 Hareesh Nagarajan
2005-02-25 17:45 ` Kris Warkentin
2005-02-25 20:20   ` Hareesh Nagarajan [this message]
2005-02-25 21:00     ` Kris Warkentin
2005-02-28 16:05       ` Hareesh Nagarajan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=421F7E59.7020400@cs.uic.edu \
    --to=hnagaraj@cs.uic.edu \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=kewarken@qnx.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox