From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-20748-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 26613 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2005 20:56:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 26596 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2005 20:56:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO av.mvista.com) (12.44.186.158)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 2005 20:56:13 -0000
Received: from [10.0.10.24] (av [127.0.0.1])
	by av.mvista.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA25713;
	Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:56:07 -0800
Message-ID: <421B9BB0.2030609@mvista.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:02:00 -0000
From: Cal Erickson <cerickson@mvista.com>
Reply-To: cerickson@mvista.com
Organization: MontaVista Software, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
CC: hilfingr@EECS.Berkeley.EDU, 999alfred@comcast.net, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Still problems with gdb and nested functions.
References: <200502222015.j1MKFB1q017797@tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU> <421B94FD.5060502@mvista.com> <01c51920$Blat.v2.4$021c8ac0@zahav.net.il>
In-Reply-To: <01c51920$Blat.v2.4$021c8ac0@zahav.net.il>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00143.txt.bz2

I believe, that Daniel J. back-ported it for us under contract from one
of the 3.4 GCC releases. I hope he is reading this. He can shed more
light on the area.

Cal

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:24:29 -0800
>>From: Cal Erickson <cerickson@mvista.com>
>>CC: tj <999alfred@comcast.net>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
>>
>>You might try updating your GCC release. We found the same problem and
>>it was fixed by upgrading GCC.
> 
> 
> To what version of GCC?  I see this problem with GCC 3.4.3, which is
> (AFAIK) the latest released version.
> 

-- 
===========================================================================
Cal Erickson                 MontaVista Software Inc.
Linux Consultant             1237 E. Arques Ave.
Phone (408) 328-0304         Sunnyvale CA 94085
Fax   (408) 328-9204         web http://www.mvista.com
===========================================================================