From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1293 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2005 09:01:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31455 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2005 08:57:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO conterra.de) (212.124.44.162) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2005 08:57:05 -0000 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by conterra.de (-) with ESMTP id 66DED1C88EF for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:57:05 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <42145C5F.8050601@conterra.de> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 19:17:00 -0000 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dieter_St=FCken?= MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: 'next' command broken on sparc References: <421208A4.7060607@conterra.de> <200502160207.j1G27wwf012748@copland.sibelius.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <200502160207.j1G27wwf012748@copland.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00113.txt.bz2 Mark Kettenis wrote: > Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:35:16 +0100 > From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dieter_St=FCken?= > > I frequently observe the 'next' command not to stop > at then next line. Instead the program continues to the end. > Similar problems are reported some time ago in conjunction > with mips, threads or shlibs. > > I doubt that this is related to the MIPS issue. Unfortunately it's > not easy to establish what the cause is. I noticed that you use gcc > 3.4.3. It might be that the compiler is optimizing in ways that GDB > looses track.... The problem is not related to the generated code. But I build gdb as a 64bit binary. Building gdb using -m32 it seems to work with gcc 3.4.3. Let me know, if I can do futher tests to narrow that problem. Dieter. -- Dieter Stüken, con terra GmbH, Münster stueken@conterra.de http://www.conterra.de/ (0)251-7474-501