From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10633 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2005 19:38:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10626 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2005 19:38:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2005 19:38:47 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j1AJclB0016254 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:38:47 -0500 Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j1AJclO16884; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:38:47 -0500 Received: from touchme.toronto.redhat.com (IDENT:postfix@touchme.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.9]) by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j1AJcl7l006932; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:38:47 -0500 Received: from redhat.com (toocool.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.72]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F8F800001; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:38:46 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <420BB846.1070207@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 02:12:00 -0000 From: Jeff Johnston User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: linux multi-threaded watchpoints? References: <420A7FF1.4080603@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <420A7FF1.4080603@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00071.txt.bz2 It's kind of stalled. Daniel made a proposal to appease Eli's dislike of the use of the observer mechanism. I asked a question a couple of weeks ago to clarify, but haven't gotten a response as of yet. -- Jeff J. Andrew Cagney wrote: > Jeff, > > How are things going with merging in multi-threaded watchpoints (it's > been in the FC RPMs for some time)? > > Andrew >