From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1556 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2005 18:47:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1408 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2005 18:46:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO marvin.codito.net) (203.197.88.2) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 21 Jan 2005 18:46:54 -0000 Received: from [192.168.100.52] ([220.225.32.98]) (authenticated bits=0) by marvin.codito.net (8.13.2/8.13.2/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j0LJ5UYj016056 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 22 Jan 2005 00:35:33 +0530 Message-ID: <41F14DE9.4030304@codito.com> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 18:47:00 -0000 From: Ramana Radhakrishnan User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040926) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nitin Gupta CC: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: history of gdb/config/xtensa directory References: <41F05718.1030106@mvista.com> <20050121012257.GA11025@nevyn.them.org> <41F14C7A.4090904@mvista.com> In-Reply-To: <41F14C7A.4090904@mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg00107.txt.bz2 Nitin Gupta wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 05:12:56PM -0800, Nitin Gupta wrote: >> >> >>> Hi, >>> Can anyone tell me what is the history of gdb/config/xtensa (no >>> longer there) directory? >>> >> >> >> You must be looking at a local tree. The FSF has never had a GDB port >> to xtensa. >> >> >> > You are right, my mistake. > I guess the thing that confused me was that I saw partial support for > xtensa in open source version of gdb > ./include/elf/xtensa.h > ./include/xtensa-isa-internal.h > ./include/xtensa-config.h > ./include/xtensa-isa.h > ./opcodes/xtensa-dis.c > ./bfd/cpu-xtensa.c > ./bfd/xtensa-isa.c > ./bfd/elf32-xtensa.c > ./bfd/xtensa-modules.c > Thats more the part thats shared between gdb and binutils :-) . bfd and opcodes are shared among binutils and gdb. Ofcourse you might have known that, in which case apologies for a redundant post. cheers Ramana -- Ramana Radhakrishnan GNU Tools codito ergo sum (www.codito.com)