From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27823 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2005 18:38:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27781 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2005 18:38:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO av.mvista.com) (12.44.186.158) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 21 Jan 2005 18:38:48 -0000 Received: from [10.0.4.48] (av [127.0.0.1]) by av.mvista.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA15760; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:38:42 -0800 Message-ID: <41F14C7A.4090904@mvista.com> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 18:38:00 -0000 From: Nitin Gupta User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: history of gdb/config/xtensa directory References: <41F05718.1030106@mvista.com> <20050121012257.GA11025@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20050121012257.GA11025@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg00106.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 05:12:56PM -0800, Nitin Gupta wrote: > > >>Hi, >>Can anyone tell me what is the history of gdb/config/xtensa (no longer >>there) directory? >> >> > >You must be looking at a local tree. The FSF has never had a GDB port >to xtensa. > > > You are right, my mistake. I guess the thing that confused me was that I saw partial support for xtensa in open source version of gdb ./include/elf/xtensa.h ./include/xtensa-isa-internal.h ./include/xtensa-config.h ./include/xtensa-isa.h ./opcodes/xtensa-dis.c ./bfd/cpu-xtensa.c ./bfd/xtensa-isa.c ./bfd/elf32-xtensa.c ./bfd/xtensa-modules.c -- MontaVista Linux- Value Wins