From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-20261-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 15367 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2004 15:37:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 15357 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2004 15:37:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 29 Nov 2004 15:37:27 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iATFbHIN002887
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:37:22 -0500
Received: from localhost.redhat.com (vpn50-72.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.72])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iATFbBr16941;
	Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:37:11 -0500
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D784129D8C;
	Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:36:29 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <41AB41FB.1010104@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:45:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20041020)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: PTRACE_SINGLESTEP into signal handler
References: <OF21C17974.4222162B-ON41256F5B.004DDFD9-41256F5B.004E0D45@de.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <OF21C17974.4222162B-ON41256F5B.004DDFD9-41256F5B.004E0D45@de.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00254.txt.bz2

Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote on 11/28/2004 12:28:14 AM:
> 
> 
>>I'm pretty sure that the answer is yes - we should stop on the first
>>instruction.  It does seem a little strange as a behavior when
>>requesting single-step to step no instructions, but we have no other
>>way to get to the beginning of the handler.  i386 was changed recently.

Yes, I, Roland, Woodhouse (and?) have been quietly working through this 
  for PPC, amd64 and i386; I guess it's time to make some noise ;-)

> Ok; so we'll change the s390 kernel to also stop at the beginning of
> the handler.  I've asked Martin to push the patch upstream.

Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=133799

Andrew