From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-20044-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 26800 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2004 15:34:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 26790 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2004 15:34:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 4 Nov 2004 15:34:00 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iA4FXxOe009858
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 10:34:00 -0500
Received: from localhost.redhat.com (to-dhcp51.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.151])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iA4FXxr30558;
	Thu, 4 Nov 2004 10:33:59 -0500
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAFC4129D8C;
	Thu,  4 Nov 2004 10:33:51 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <418A4BDE.6050302@gnu.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 15:34:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20041020)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Paul Schlie <schlie@comcast.net>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB 6.4 and translations
References: <BDAEE197.7C21%schlie@comcast.net> <01c4c229$Blat.v2.2.2$72d18d40@zahav.net.il>
In-Reply-To: <01c4c229$Blat.v2.2.2$72d18d40@zahav.net.il>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00037.txt.bz2

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 19:27:19 -0500
>>From: Paul Schlie <schlie@comcast.net>
>>
>>Although I don't know if it's been considered or even an issue, but it may
>>be worth trying to avoid the use of Unicode's typographical quote characters
>>in otherwise ASCII message string output on even Unicode supported platforms
>>by default
> 
> 
> Sorry, I have no idea what you are talking about; please consider
> elaborating, e.g., by providing an example of such a problematic
> message.

Yep, huh?  Can someone please post a concrete example of what this is 
all about?

Andrew