From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16466 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2004 14:03:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16338 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2004 14:03:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp10.atl.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.246) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 12 Oct 2004 14:03:38 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by smtp10.atl.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1CHNFQ-0002Cn-00; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:03:28 -0400 Received: from mindspring.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 883564B35A; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:03:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 22:15:00 -0000 From: Michael Chastain To: cagney@gnu.org, bob@brasko.net Subject: Re: Bob's MI objective Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, eliz@gnu.org, drow@false.org Message-ID: <416BE448.nailLZH115PYO@mindspring.com> References: <416451B0.3060306@gnu.org> <20041006212652.GB13271@white> <20041008023243.GA15320@white> <01c4ad2b$Blat.v2.2.2$f25b86a0@zahav.net.il> <20041008134218.GA1467@nevyn.them.org> <01c4ad53$Blat.v2.2.2$750a0be0@zahav.net.il> <4167081A.3020306@gnu.org> <20041008221026.GA16824@white> <20041010181350.GA17779@white> <4169F671.4010409@gnu.org> <20041011135947.GC18844@white> In-Reply-To: <20041011135947.GC18844@white> User-Agent: nail 10.8 6/28/04 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00296.txt.bz2 Bob Rossi writes: > However, if it can use multiple MI versions, then a handshake algorithm > must take place. Basically, GDB starts up saying that it can speak > several different protocols, and then the front end picks one, and then > GDB uses that protocol. I haven't followed this thread too closely, but this seems simple and natural to me. Michael