From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: ada vs identical flex
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 23:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41659C65.2090603@gnu.org> (raw)
I'm comparing the generated ada-lex.c output from FLEX 2.5.2. Yes,
that's comparing the output from the same "identical" FLEX - one is
found on NetBSD/PPC 1.6.2, and the other on FC3.
For yyrealloc, I'm finding that some cases are wrapped in #ifndef
YY_USES_REJECT, while others are not vis:
NBSD FC3
declaration yes no
definition yes no
reference yes yes
ada_flex_use no no
On NetBSD, since ada_flex_use tries to refer to a function wrapped in
#ifndef YY_USE_REJECT (i.e., #ifdef'ed out) the build barfs.
On the other hand on FC3, the declaration / definition are always
visible and the build succeeds.
Ideas?
Andrew
next reply other threads:[~2004-10-07 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-07 23:17 Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-10-08 2:32 ` Paul Hilfinger
2004-10-08 11:00 Paul Hilfinger
2004-10-09 0:29 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41659C65.2090603@gnu.org \
--to=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox