From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7947 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2004 22:36:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7939 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2004 22:36:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 6 Oct 2004 22:36:30 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i96MaO0M018580 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 18:36:24 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i96MaOr27025; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 18:36:24 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C642528D2; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 18:36:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <41647352.50603@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 02:40:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040831 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bob Rossi Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Bob's MI objective References: <416451B0.3060306@gnu.org> <20041006212652.GB13271@white> In-Reply-To: <20041006212652.GB13271@white> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00191.txt.bz2 > * I would like to know what GDB's policy is in regards to supporting old > MI protocols. ( I have received several opposing views on this ) By "supported" you're expecting? I've stated what people developing GDB test, and given you a pretty clear hint as to the consequence. I was wondering more of what your project and its goals were. Andrew