From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24623 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2004 19:38:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24615 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2004 19:38:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 5 Oct 2004 19:38:14 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i95Jc8LI026706 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 15:38:13 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i95Jc8r14631; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 15:38:08 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32DC28D2; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 15:37:48 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4162F80C.4070409@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 19:41:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040831 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bob Rossi Cc: GDB Subject: Re: MI and backwards compatibility References: <20041001142517.GD4100@white> In-Reply-To: <20041001142517.GD4100@white> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00100.txt.bz2 Other than ensuring that there's a reasonable overlap between EMACS and GDB releases, I don't see how this is a GDB problem. Just keep in mind that only the last offical MI release (currently gdb.mi/mi2-*) and extensions added since then (gdb.mi/mi1-*) are being covered by GDB's testsuite. Andrew