From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26195 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2004 15:20:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26179 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2004 15:20:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 7 Sep 2004 15:20:00 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i87FJsS2000446 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 11:20:00 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i87FJm303367; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 11:19:48 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCCA528D2; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 11:19:44 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <413DD190.50201@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 15:20:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040831 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Chastain Cc: msnyder@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: MAINTAINERS: add mec as second maintainer for gdb.threads References: <413DC9A9.nailJ6A1BZWUX@mindspring.com> In-Reply-To: <413DC9A9.nailJ6A1BZWUX@mindspring.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2 I sent you an e-mail saying that I'd get back to you shortly ;-) The conversation didn't peter out, but rather was taken to the core developers to see if they had any concerns with the proposal. None were rasied, so yes its time to raise the proposal here in this forum. enjoy, Andrew > Andrew and Michael Snyder and I have talked about adding me as > a second maintainer for the gdb.threads tests: > > threads (gdb.threads) Michael Snyder msnyder@redhat.com > + Michael Chastain mec.gnu@mindspring.com > > The conversation petered out with approval, but no action. > > How about it? > > Who is the maintainer of MAINTAINERS ... do I go to the steering > committee and ask for a vote? > > Michael >