From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16878 invoked by alias); 6 Sep 2011 15:40:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 16688 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Sep 2011 15:40:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from cluster-a.mailcontrol.com (HELO cluster-a.mailcontrol.com) (85.115.52.190) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:40:05 +0000 Received: from rly03a.srv.mailcontrol.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rly03a.srv.mailcontrol.com (MailControl) with ESMTP id p86Fe26Z023943 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:40:02 +0100 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rly03a.srv.mailcontrol.com (MailControl) id p86FdiOY022467 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:39:44 +0100 Received: from mail2.neceur.com (mail2.neceur.com [195.47.207.4]) by rly03a-eth0.srv.mailcontrol.com (envelope-sender ) (MIMEDefang) with ESMTP id p86Fdhhs022277; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:39:44 +0100 (BST) Received: from intmail1.nenh.neceur.com (intmail1.nenh.neceur.com [172.29.14.11]) by mail2.neceur.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p86Fdgas004371; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:39:42 +0100 Received: from av1.neceur.com (av1.neceur.com [172.29.14.21]) by intmail1.nenh.neceur.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p86Fdfxi025878; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:39:41 +0100 Received: from av1.neceur.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA80 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC9F296B83; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:39:41 +0100 (BST) Received: from EX10CAS01.EU.NEC.COM (unknown [172.29.155.132]) by av1.neceur.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E96296B80; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:39:41 +0100 (BST) Received: from EX10MBX02.EU.NEC.COM ([169.254.2.163]) by EX10CAS01.EU.NEC.COM ([172.29.155.132]) with mapi id 14.01.0289.001; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:39:41 +0100 From: David Aldrich To: Jan Kratochvil CC: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" , "gdb@sourceware.org" Subject: RE: Empty core dump file Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:40:00 -0000 Message-ID: <41302A7145AC054FA7A96CFD03835A0A04E3F2@EX10MBX02.EU.NEC.COM> References: <41302A7145AC054FA7A96CFD03835A0A047BD8@EX10MBX02.EU.NEC.COM> <20110826131657.GW25065@radix50.net> <41302A7145AC054FA7A96CFD03835A0A049A74@EX10MBX02.EU.NEC.COM> <41302A7145AC054FA7A96CFD03835A0A04E1D9@EX10MBX02.EU.NEC.COM> <20110906111400.GA2711@host1.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: <20110906111400.GA2711@host1.jankratochvil.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2 > > I can't work out whether it will delete directory /tmp/corefiles. If > > it does, then new core files will not be saved. >=20 > Not tested on CentOS-5.x but at least still Fedora 14 (and therefore I be= lieve > even CentOS-5.x) tmpwatch has a bug the directories are never removed. > (I haven't investigated what is the real reason for it, whether it isn't = just due > to updatedb (although it has /tmp in PRUNEPATHS) etc.) >=20 Thanks for this information. David