From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2751 invoked by alias); 27 Aug 2004 16:04:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2744 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2004 16:04:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 27 Aug 2004 16:04:29 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7RG4SS2026031 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:04:29 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i7RG4S320469; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:04:28 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA46B2B9D; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:03:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <412F5B46.5000906@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:04:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040801 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baurjan Ismagulov Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB's low hanging backlog References: <4116A287.7000108@gnu.org> <412B9A7D.1080304@gnu.org> <20040824224125.GA7869@ata.cs.hun.edu.tr> In-Reply-To: <20040824224125.GA7869@ata.cs.hun.edu.tr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00414.txt.bz2 > Hello, Andrew! > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 03:43:57PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >>> -- i18n >>> -- CXX compile > > > I could try one of these if I finish the test case soon. Why is the > latter important? Yes, i18n is far more important than CXX compile. CXX compile, however is medium/long term strategic. As with GCC we need to start clearing obsticals blocking an eventual migration to an OO language (and failing that, C++ :-). Andrew