From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29142 invoked by alias); 26 Aug 2004 22:46:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29132 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2004 22:46:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO barry.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.25) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 26 Aug 2004 22:46:25 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by barry.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1C0T0f-0004tN-00; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:46:21 -0400 Received: from mindspring.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix) with SMTP id ADBF74B102; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:46:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 22:46:00 -0000 From: Michael Chastain To: cagney@gnu.org, bob@brasko.net Subject: Re: GDB/MI Output Syntax Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <412E683C.nail8HL2532EK@mindspring.com> References: <20040825154348.GA19533@white> <412E5221.8010601@gnu.org> <20040826212516.GA21451@white> In-Reply-To: <20040826212516.GA21451@white> User-Agent: nail 10.8 6/28/04 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00407.txt.bz2 Just a nit: LL(1) and LALR(1) are different things, and bison/yacc accept LALR(1) grammars. Bob Rossi wrote: > Also, I propose that the grammar Michael and I are working also get > posted, and say that it is a dirivative of the original. Both ways of > posting the data are helpful to front end developers. Again I say, I want the printed grammar in gdb.texinfo to be as close as possible to something that a front-end writer can stick into bison and *use*. Because if we have two grammars, one printed one that does not compile and one machine-readaable one that does compile, and they are different, guess what's going to happen.