From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: Alain Magloire <alain@qnx.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: MI level command
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 22:04:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <412BBB2D.7040108@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200407082333.TAA25718@smtp.ott.qnx.com>
> Yellow
>
>
> Scenario: We want to know wich level of MI that we are currently working in.
> This can allow to adjust what MI command to use and how to parse them.
>
> Problems: No such command in MI and no GDB variable that we can test via -gdb-show.
> The version of gdb
> gdb --version
> show different things in different distributions, sometimes it is a number based on date
> etc ...
>
> So would a patch implementing
>
> -gdb-mi-level
> ^done,level=1
>
> be a good thing ?
This needs to be resolved.
I think its become clear that clients are choosing to support multiple
debugger releases rather than certifying against a single debugger and
mi version. This is contrary to the expectation that the clients would
tightly couple their front end to a specific GDB and MI version, and
consequently, when starting GDB, specify a specific MI version.
Given this, we need to change the way versioning is handled.
- we can't create a situtation where GDB is required to retain existing
[broken] behavior indefinitly
- we can certainly look for ways that let the client use both old and
newer GDB's - the clients then get to decide how much backward
incompatibility they wish to retain without imposing the burdon on GDB.
To that end:
-> we should probably implement significant command output (and more
importantly input) changes by adding a new command. A missing new
command is easy to detect, just run it with no options.
-> minor output changes (new field for instance) do not need a new command
-> MI version changes tied to significant changes
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-24 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-08 23:33 Alain Magloire
2004-07-09 20:49 ` Jason Molenda
2004-07-10 17:18 ` Arnaud Charlet
2004-07-10 22:51 ` Bob Rossi
2004-07-12 17:51 ` Alain Magloire
2004-08-24 22:04 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-08-24 23:54 ` Bob Rossi
2004-08-25 13:23 ` Alain Magloire
2004-07-11 22:49 Nick Roberts
2004-07-12 21:14 ` Jason Molenda
[not found] <20040709012815.GA4464@white>
2004-07-12 17:38 ` Alain Magloire
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=412BBB2D.7040108@gnu.org \
--to=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=alain@qnx.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox