Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: Alain Magloire <alain@qnx.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: MI level command
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 22:04:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <412BBB2D.7040108@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200407082333.TAA25718@smtp.ott.qnx.com>

> Yellow
> 
> 
> Scenario:  We want to know wich level of MI that we are currently working in.
>   This can allow to adjust what MI command to use and how to parse them.
> 
> Problems: No such command in MI and no GDB variable that we can test via -gdb-show.
>   The version of  gdb
>      gdb --version
>   show different things in different distributions, sometimes it is a number based on date
>   etc ...
> 
> So would a patch implementing
> 
>  -gdb-mi-level
>  ^done,level=1
> 
> be a good thing ?

This needs to be resolved.

I think its become clear that clients are choosing to support multiple 
debugger releases rather than certifying against a single debugger and 
mi version.  This is contrary to the expectation that the clients would 
tightly couple their front end to a specific GDB and MI version, and 
consequently, when starting GDB, specify a specific MI version.

Given this, we need to change the way versioning is handled.

- we can't create a situtation where GDB is required to retain existing 
[broken] behavior indefinitly

- we can certainly look for ways that let the client use both old and 
newer GDB's - the clients then get to decide how much backward 
incompatibility they wish to retain without imposing the burdon on GDB.

To that end:

-> we should probably implement significant command output (and more 
importantly input) changes by adding a new command.  A missing new 
command is easy to detect, just run it with no options.

-> minor output changes (new field for instance) do not need a new command

-> MI version changes tied to significant changes

Andrew





  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-08-24 22:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-08 23:33 Alain Magloire
2004-07-09 20:49 ` Jason Molenda
2004-07-10 17:18   ` Arnaud Charlet
2004-07-10 22:51     ` Bob Rossi
2004-07-12 17:51   ` Alain Magloire
2004-08-24 22:04 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-08-24 23:54   ` Bob Rossi
2004-08-25 13:23   ` Alain Magloire
2004-07-11 22:49 Nick Roberts
2004-07-12 21:14 ` Jason Molenda
     [not found] <20040709012815.GA4464@white>
2004-07-12 17:38 ` Alain Magloire

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=412BBB2D.7040108@gnu.org \
    --to=cagney@gnu.org \
    --cc=alain@qnx.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox