From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-19159-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 2730 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2004 02:20:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 2715 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2004 02:20:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO tisch.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.157)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 24 Aug 2004 02:20:19 -0000
Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com)
	by tisch.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
	id 1BzQuz-0001pI-00; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 22:20:13 -0400
Received: from mindspring.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix) with SMTP
	id AF5514B102; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 22:20:29 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 02:20:00 -0000
From: Michael Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>
To: drow@false.org, dan@imi-test.com
Subject: Re: cannot subscript something of type <data variable, no debug info>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Message-ID: <412AA5ED.nailDJP1N47MJ@mindspring.com>
References: <005601c4871d$67c8c9f0$0401a8c0@dan>
 <20040821021144.GA3321@nevyn.them.org>
 <008d01c48952$b7e0e7b0$0401a8c0@dan>
 <412A616D.nailD4K28EC6E@mindspring.com>
 <009e01c48959$a5192640$0401a8c0@dan>
In-Reply-To: <009e01c48959$a5192640$0401a8c0@dan>
User-Agent: nail 10.8 6/28/04
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00306.txt.bz2

"Daniel Miller (IMI)" <dan@imi-test.com> wrote:
> Is it possible that upgrading the kernel affected anything??  That seems
> unlikely, since building the kernel shouldn't change any of the compiler
> libraries, I don't think??

Right.  All this symbol-handling stuff is above the kernel level.

There is a small chance that something really freaky in your glibc
could cause this.  That's pretty far down the list of suspects,
though.

> I'm going to go ahead and send you my binary for tester; it's small enough
> that there's no reason not to, I don't think.  I'll put it in bz2 format...

Cool.  I'll look at it soon, like tomorrow.