From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-18965-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 6339 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2004 18:31:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 6330 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2004 18:31:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 7 Aug 2004 18:31:40 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i77IVee3000500
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 14:31:40 -0400
Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i77IVba23455;
	Sat, 7 Aug 2004 14:31:40 -0400
Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7551C2B9D; Sat,  7 Aug 2004 14:31:30 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <41152002.9020708@gnu.org>
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 18:31:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040801
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Baurjan Ismagulov <ibr@ata.cs.hun.edu.tr>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB 6.2.1?
References: <41128FD4.5020702@gnu.org> <20040805204835.GI1192@gnat.com> <41139F3F.7040508@gnu.org> <20040806161616.GO1192@gnat.com> <41151A34.1000704@gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <41151A34.1000704@gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00112.txt.bz2

> I'll commit the ``absolute source path'' patch then 6.2.1 is good to go (well depending on how Eli and Mark resolve the i386 change). 

I'm going to back out of my decision here :-(

I've looked over the patch and am really reluctant to back-port it 
without a testcase illustrating what it fixed.  While yes a bug, its not 
like the absolute shocker MIPS crash in 6.2.  It's also long standing. 
I think for this we should instead accelerate 6.3 a little and pull it 
into the Oct/Nov timeframe.

Andrew