From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8663 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2004 20:50:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8656 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2004 20:50:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 5 Aug 2004 20:50:09 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i75Ko9e3023203 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 16:50:09 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i75Ko3a23858; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 16:50:03 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA9CF2B9D; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 16:49:56 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <41129D74.8030609@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 20:50:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040801 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Jim Blandy , Joel Brobecker , Mark Kettenis , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: interface to partial support for DW_OP_piece in dwarf2expr.[ch] References: <4111145F.7000504@gnu.org> <200408050952.i759qXFK010181@juw15.nfra.nl> <20040805162734.GG1192@gnat.com> <20040805184611.GA12288@nevyn.them.org> <411290C6.3000704@gnu.org> <20040805203421.GA17540@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20040805203421.GA17540@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00086.txt.bz2 > On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 03:55:50PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >>>> >On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 01:42:25PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote: >>>> > >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>>Without stopping discussion of the best way to handle scattered values >>>>>> >>>in core GDB, I'd still like to hear comments on my suggested change to >>>>>> >>>dwarf2expr.[ch]'s interface, if there are any. >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>>Because dwarf2expr is supposed to be concerned with evaluating Dwarf >>>>>> >>>expressions, and *avoid* building GDB data structures directly, I >>>>>> >>>think that change can be assessed separately from the larger (and >>>>>> >>>harder, and more important) question. >>> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >I think it's fine. You spelled "yield" wrong. >> >>> >>> Did this get answered? >> >>>> >- a single value can have multiple locations (important for store) > > > No. I was worried I'd missed something. > dwarf2loc, which deals with the lists of > locations, will need to be aware of this; but a single location > expression only has one location. ah, thank you. Andrew