From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-18886-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 5787 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2004 16:54:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 5774 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2004 16:54:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 4 Aug 2004 16:54:50 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i74Gsoe3014384
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 12:54:50 -0400
Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i74Gsoa10076;
	Wed, 4 Aug 2004 12:54:50 -0400
Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 316042B9D; Wed,  4 Aug 2004 12:54:44 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <411114D4.1000108@gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 16:54:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040801
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Cc: Dave Korn <dk@artimi.com>
Subject: Re: dot five-o series versions - GDB 6.2.50
References: <NUTMEGvSrjQXhkblj7Q00000be3@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
In-Reply-To: <NUTMEGvSrjQXhkblj7Q00000be3@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00033.txt.bz2

>   Cut'n'paste error, or have I not understood the convention you were using
> in that diagram?  Or both?
> 
Mutter something rude, attempt #2.  thanks :-)

Hello,

Ref: http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/translation/HTML/maintainers.html

The translators are looking for a versioning schema that makes it easy 
to undersand how two versions relate to each other.  Unfortunatly, GDB's 
current versioning doesn't do this.  Without knowing the policy, it's 
hard to know whats going on with:

     2004-09-03
     6.2_2004-09_03

consequently, I'd like to propose that things be changed to the following:

M.N.5x:
Indicate the mainline.  It's half way between releases -> .50.
Ex 6.2.50, 6.2.50_2004-09-03

M.N.9x:
Indicate pre release versions drawn from the branch.

M.N / M.N.O:
The release.

This leads to the sequence:

6.2.50_2004-09-03
6.2.50_2004-09-04
...
     <branch> -----------> <mainline>
6.2.90_2004-10-05     6.3.50_2004-10-05
6.2.91                6.3.50_2004-10-06
...                   ...
6.2.91_2004-10-10     6.3.50_2004-10-10
...                   ...
6.3 <release>         6.3.50_2004-10-11
...                   ...
6.3_2004-10-12        6.3.50_2004-10-12
...                   ...
6.3.1 <release>       6.3.50_2004-10-13
...                   ...
<close>               ...
                       ...
                            <branch> ----------> <mainline>
                       6.3.90_2004-10-05     6.4.50_2004-10-05
                       6.3.91                6.4.50_2004-10-06
                       ...                   ...
                       6.3.91_2004-10-10     6.4.50_2004-10-10
                       ...                   ...
                       6.4 <release>         6.4.50_2004-10-11
                       ...                   ...
                       6.4_2004-10-12        6.4.50_2004-10-12
                       ...                   ...
                       6.4.1 <release>       6.4.50_2004-10-13
                       ...                   ...
                       <close>               ...
                                             ...

comment!

Andrew