From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6606 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2004 15:07:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6596 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2004 15:07:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2004 15:07:00 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i68F70e3031026 for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 11:07:00 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i68F6x015558; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 11:06:59 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50592B9D; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 11:06:42 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <40ED6302.3020704@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 15:07:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Berlin Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, Christopher Faylor Subject: Re: bugzilla References: <40ED5AB8.9060304@gnu.org> <745BC5DA-D0EE-11D8-9149-000A95DA505C@dberlin.org> In-Reply-To: <745BC5DA-D0EE-11D8-9149-000A95DA505C@dberlin.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00069.txt.bz2 > > On Jul 8, 2004, at 10:31 AM, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> Please discuss :-) >> >> -- >> >> I've cc'd DanielB and ChrisF who would need to be involved in any logistical matters. >> > I've converted the GDB GNATS database before with little or no problems. > I can put the results up on www.dberlin.org/bugzilla if you want to see what it looks like > > The only real problem in conversion is that the bugs will not have the same PR number they used to, though they will be contiguous (IE they will be offset by some number). Why is a renumbering needed? It's our database can't we do what we like? :-) Andrew