From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: gdb 6.2 blockers
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 17:07:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40EADC2B.7080504@gnu.org> (raw)
Hello,
The first thing to do is look over what's already been fixed, and why we
should push out a new release:
- signal trampolines ``work'' (ignoring kernel bugs :-)
- dwarf 2 cygwin support
- lots of new (or revised) native configurations
- this kvm thingie whats it (mark needs a news entry)
- the `start' command
- ppc64 is ``so much better''
- what else?
however, onto the issue. Here's a list of what I know of that could
potentially block 6.2:
1650: I suspect this is really a kernel race condition.
I remember that Jeff was pointing out that the bug this tickles is a
race condition (hence isn't always reproducable). The fix for NPTL
involves kernel changes, I'm not sure about linuxthreads.
HP/UX: ``regressions''
This needs to be balanced against all the additional tests that do now
pass. Some bits are working much better than ever before, just not all :-)
vsyscall:
For those following BFD you'll see I'm having fun closing this :-)
PIE:
This stuff needs to be reviewed/merged.
inter-cu:
This stuff needs to be reviewed/merged.
e500:
Architecture problems. Also dw_op_piece, xregset, ...
I think we can split this into three problems:
- 1650 is an issue, but even there I'm wondering how much. It's ticking
a horrible nasty race condition and may not be a real problem in the
field - do people really run 100 thread programs using linuxthreads.
- architecture specific problems HP/UX, and much of e500, that can be
committed after the branch
- new features - inter-cu, PIE, VSYSCALL, inter-cu, xregset? dw_op_piece
These should all go into the mainline. In some cases, these have been
missing for years.
Andrew
next reply other threads:[~2004-07-06 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-06 17:07 Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-07-07 15:26 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-07-07 16:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-07-06 18:24 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-07-06 19:14 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-07-06 19:32 ` Manoj Iyer
2004-07-06 20:03 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-07-06 20:56 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40EADC2B.7080504@gnu.org \
--to=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox