Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: gdb 6.2 blockers
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 17:07:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40EADC2B.7080504@gnu.org> (raw)

Hello,

The first thing to do is look over what's already been fixed, and why we 
should push out a new release:

- signal trampolines ``work'' (ignoring kernel bugs :-)
- dwarf 2 cygwin support
- lots of new (or revised) native configurations
- this kvm thingie whats it (mark needs a news entry)
- the `start' command
- ppc64 is ``so much better''
- what else?

however, onto the issue.  Here's a list of what I know of that could 
potentially block 6.2:

1650: I suspect this is really a kernel race condition.
I remember that Jeff was pointing out that the bug this tickles is a 
race condition (hence isn't always reproducable).  The fix for NPTL 
involves kernel changes, I'm not sure about linuxthreads.

HP/UX: ``regressions''
This needs to be balanced against all the additional tests that do now 
pass.  Some bits are working much better than ever before, just not all :-)

vsyscall:
For those following BFD you'll see I'm having fun closing this :-)

PIE:
This stuff needs to be reviewed/merged.

inter-cu:
This stuff needs to be reviewed/merged.

e500:
Architecture problems.  Also dw_op_piece, xregset, ...

I think we can split this into three problems:

- 1650 is an issue, but even there I'm wondering how much.  It's ticking 
a horrible nasty race condition and may not be a real problem in the 
field - do people really run 100 thread programs using linuxthreads.

- architecture specific problems HP/UX, and much of e500, that can be 
committed after the branch

- new features - inter-cu, PIE, VSYSCALL, inter-cu, xregset? dw_op_piece
These should all go into the mainline.  In some cases, these have been 
missing for years.

Andrew


             reply	other threads:[~2004-07-06 17:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-06 17:07 Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-07-07 15:26 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-07-07 16:12   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-07-06 18:24 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-07-06 19:14 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-07-06 19:32 ` Manoj Iyer
2004-07-06 20:03 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-07-06 20:56 Michael Elizabeth Chastain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40EADC2B.7080504@gnu.org \
    --to=cagney@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox