From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 853 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2004 17:45:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 840 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2004 17:45:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hub.ott.qnx.com) (209.226.137.76) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 30 Jun 2004 17:45:21 -0000 Received: from smtp.ott.qnx.com (smtp.ott.qnx.com [10.0.2.158]) by hub.ott.qnx.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA08230; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:06:04 -0400 Received: from [10.4.2.2] ([10.4.2.2]) by smtp.ott.qnx.com (8.8.8/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA14704; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:45:21 -0400 Message-ID: <40E2FC82.4020008@qnx.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:56:00 -0000 From: Kris Warkentin User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roland Zerek CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Breakpoints in the library code References: <40E29098.4040207@poczta.fm> <40E2B0FD.6050907@qnx.com> <40E2B3B6.6070802@poczta.fm> <40E2C044.2020704@qnx.com> <40E2C6CE.4070703@poczta.fm> <40E2DAB0.7030003@qnx.com> <40E2E20A.7070000@poczta.fm> In-Reply-To: <40E2E20A.7070000@poczta.fm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00307.txt.bz2 You should hit 'reply all' when you reply to me - that way you response goes to the mailing list as well. You might get help from someone else as well. Question: did you try break wxXmlResource to see which members gdb thinks are available for breakpoints? cheers, Kris Roland Zerek wrote: > U¿ytkownik Kris Warkentin napisa³: > >> Hmm. Well, if it's not recognizing the name of the method, you might >> want to try setting the breakpoint by filename:line number. (ie >> foo.cc:73). If that works, then when you hit the breakpoint, you can >> do a backtrace and see what gdb thinks the name of the method is. > > > It works quite well, thanks. However backtrace gives me the same method > name as expected... > > Another question is: why command line debugger works perfectly and GUI > frontends not... Are there some incompatibilities in gdb api or the way > the insight or ddd comunicates with gdb is incorrect? Sorry for possibly > trivial question but I am not gdb expert. > > Thanks for advises :-) >