From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16169 invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2004 18:19:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16159 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2004 18:19:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 24 Jun 2004 18:19:39 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5OIJce3022934 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:19:39 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i5OIJc008642; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:19:38 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703312B9D; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:19:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <40DB1B2E.1080104@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:19:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Carlton , Jim Blandy Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, gdb-discuss@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Gdb-discuss] Should we close down gdb-discuss@gnu.org? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00246.txt.bz2 > .. but I would lean towards leaving the > list in place until that happens. Yes. Jim, I suspect this is really a marketing problem. Can I suggest approaching the posters and just ask them what information they relied on when identifying that list? We not so recently had a similar problem with PRMS vs bug-gdb . It turned out that users were dilligently (and obviously correctly) following instructions in one of the README files, oops! Once that was fixed the problem largely went away! Andrew PS: The mail archives appear to be broken :-(