From: Michael Mueller <m.mueller99@kay-mueller.de>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Post GDB 6.2, require new frame code
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 07:54:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40D69400.6090500@kay-mueller.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40D34274.50803@gnu.org>
The new frame infrastructure is dwarf2 based if I understand that
correctly. Does that mean that all stabs support will go away after 6.2?
(I'm using gdb to debug Sun C compiled programs on Solaris/SPARC. The
current version Sun C 5.5 can output dwarf2 but the default still is
stabs and it seems they just have started the transition to dwarf2).
Michael
Andrew Cagney wrote:
> GDB's new frame infrastructure was introduced more than a year ago
> (dwarf2-frame added May '03) and then included in the 6.0 and 6.1
> releases. Since that introduction, we've seen:
>
> alpha ARM AVR CRIS d10v FRV
> PA-RISC i386 ia64 m32r m68hcll
> m68k m88k mips ppc s390 sh4
> sparc vax
>
> all updated to this new framework. Unfortunately, though, we're still
> left with a few architectures relying on the old framework.
>
> We're now faced with the problem of what to do with the remaining
> architectures. The choices I see are:
>
> - continue to support the legacy framework
>
> - convert the remaining architectures
>
> - phase out the remaining architectures
>
> So as to avoid the problem of this dragging on indefinitely, we need to
> establish a clear schedule by which all architectures are expected to
> have been updated. To that end:
>
> - make GDB 6.2 the last release to support the legacy frame code
>
> - in 6.2 NEWS, list unconverted architectures as about to be obsoleted
>
> - Post 6.2 release, obsolete any remaining architectures
>
> comments,
> Andrew
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-21 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-18 19:29 Andrew Cagney
2004-06-21 7:06 ` Jim Blandy
2004-06-21 13:30 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-06-21 7:54 ` Michael Mueller [this message]
2004-06-21 8:44 ` Jim Blandy
2004-06-23 7:41 ` Corinna Vinschen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40D69400.6090500@kay-mueller.de \
--to=m.mueller99@kay-mueller.de \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox