Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Mueller <m.mueller99@kay-mueller.de>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Post GDB 6.2, require new frame code
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 07:54:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40D69400.6090500@kay-mueller.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40D34274.50803@gnu.org>

The new frame infrastructure is dwarf2 based if I understand that 
correctly. Does that mean that all stabs support will go away after 6.2?

(I'm using gdb to debug Sun C compiled programs on Solaris/SPARC. The 
current version Sun C 5.5 can output dwarf2 but the default still is 
stabs and it seems they just have started the transition to dwarf2).

Michael


Andrew Cagney wrote:
> GDB's new frame infrastructure was introduced more than a year ago
> (dwarf2-frame added May '03) and then included in the 6.0 and 6.1
> releases.  Since that introduction, we've seen:
> 
>     alpha ARM AVR CRIS d10v FRV
>     PA-RISC i386 ia64 m32r m68hcll
>     m68k m88k mips ppc s390 sh4
>     sparc vax
> 
> all updated to this new framework.  Unfortunately, though, we're still
> left with a few architectures relying on the old framework.
> 
> We're now faced with the problem of what to do with the remaining
> architectures.  The choices I see are:
> 
> - continue to support the legacy framework
> 
> - convert the remaining architectures
> 
> - phase out the remaining architectures
> 
> So as to avoid the problem of this dragging on indefinitely, we need to
> establish a clear schedule by which all architectures are expected to
> have been updated.  To that end:
> 
> - make GDB 6.2 the last release to support the legacy frame code
> 
> - in 6.2 NEWS, list unconverted architectures as about to be obsoleted
> 
> - Post 6.2 release, obsolete any remaining architectures
> 
> comments,
> Andrew
> 
> 
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-06-21  7:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-18 19:29 Andrew Cagney
2004-06-21  7:06 ` Jim Blandy
2004-06-21 13:30   ` Andrew Cagney
2004-06-21  7:54 ` Michael Mueller [this message]
2004-06-21  8:44   ` Jim Blandy
2004-06-23  7:41 ` Corinna Vinschen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40D69400.6090500@kay-mueller.de \
    --to=m.mueller99@kay-mueller.de \
    --cc=cagney@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox