From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: Steven Johnson <sjohnson@neurizon.net>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@wasabisystems.com>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB and ARM Frame Pointer strangeness
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:33:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40C9D0A7.7040304@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40C8FB5A.2060504@neurizon.net>
> Andrew,
>
> Im not sure what you mean by "supports and tests (gdb.asm) assembler debugging" is there a GDB command to put into "assembler debugging mode"? Or a flag that can be set? Specifically, what is the (gdb.asm) reference? Is it a document, or command, or something else? Otherwise the statement concordes with my long held beliefs about GDB.
See the directory src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.asm/.
> Also, I can provide a lot of information about it, but im not sure what "sequence" you are referring to. Are you reffering to the sequence of commands I type in to GDB, the sequence of code within GDB, or a combination of the two.
>
> Do you want me to turn on the GDB Debugging flags for the remote protocol and FP management, execute the sequence that causes the problem and then post the results?
The internal logic that leads to GDB deciding that it should
de-reference FP. ``(gdb) set debug frame ; (gdb) set debug remote 1''
might give you a hint, however you'll in the end need to examine GDB's
internals.
However, and regardless, you need to fix your target.
Andrew
> Steven.
>
> Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>> (BTW, GDB already both supports and tests (gdb.asm) assembler debugging.)
>>
>> Perhaphs the problem here isn't as simple as described. Can you determine exactly what sequence of events lead to those memory references?
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-11 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-07 8:50 Steven Johnson
2004-06-08 4:25 ` Steven Johnson
2004-06-08 4:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-06-08 5:02 ` Steven Johnson
2004-06-08 12:26 ` Mark Salter
2004-06-08 23:47 ` Steven Johnson
2004-06-09 15:14 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-06-10 0:06 ` Steven Johnson
2004-06-10 2:20 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-06-10 4:37 ` Steven Johnson
2004-06-10 5:10 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-06-10 7:16 ` Steven Johnson
2004-06-10 21:32 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-06-11 0:46 ` Steven Johnson
2004-06-11 15:33 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-06-10 9:03 ` Richard Earnshaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40C9D0A7.7040304@gnu.org \
--to=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=ian@wasabisystems.com \
--cc=sjohnson@neurizon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox