From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 956 invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2004 00:46:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 949 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2004 00:46:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gizmo07ps.bigpond.com) (144.140.71.42) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 11 Jun 2004 00:46:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 7864 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2004 00:22:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO psmam01.bigpond.com) (144.135.25.69) by gizmo07ps.bigpond.com with SMTP; 11 Jun 2004 00:22:50 -0000 Received: from cpe-203-51-247-11.qld.bigpond.net.au ([203.51.247.11]) by psmam01.bigpond.com(MAM REL_3_4_2a 65/11541273) with SMTP id 11541273; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 10:22:50 +1000 Message-ID: <40C8FB5A.2060504@neurizon.net> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 00:46:00 -0000 From: Steven Johnson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040115 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney CC: Ian Lance Taylor , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB and ARM Frame Pointer strangeness References: <40C42C75.5020208@neurizon.net> <40C53F70.8030101@neurizon.net> <20040608042936.GA7514@nevyn.them.org> <40C54834.4080408@neurizon.net> <20040608122635.35BD37907B@deneb.localdomain> <40C65020.7010904@neurizon.net> <40C7292E.5040906@gnu.org> <40C79F44.6050006@neurizon.net> <40C7E59F.8080400@neurizon.net> <40C80AD0.3020708@neurizon.net> <40C8D35B.8030205@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <40C8D35B.8030205@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00109.txt.bz2 Andrew, Im not sure what you mean by "supports and tests (gdb.asm) assembler debugging" is there a GDB command to put into "assembler debugging mode"? Or a flag that can be set? Specifically, what is the (gdb.asm) reference? Is it a document, or command, or something else? Otherwise the statement concordes with my long held beliefs about GDB. Also, I can provide a lot of information about it, but im not sure what "sequence" you are referring to. Are you reffering to the sequence of commands I type in to GDB, the sequence of code within GDB, or a combination of the two. Do you want me to turn on the GDB Debugging flags for the remote protocol and FP management, execute the sequence that causes the problem and then post the results? Steven. Andrew Cagney wrote: > (BTW, GDB already both supports and tests (gdb.asm) assembler debugging.) > > Perhaphs the problem here isn't as simple as described. Can you > determine exactly what sequence of events lead to those memory > references? > > Andrew > >