From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB 6.1.1 2004-05-21-gmt
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 17:15:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40B4D0A9.7080104@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040525222803.GQ7207@tausq.org>
>>There seem to be a significant number of fixes even without this -
>>> basics such as value return and backtraces.
>>>
>>> As for the arch and other core changes, they can wait until 6.2.
>
>
> ok... it's just that the gdbarch change will fix MANY problems in the
> testsuite. :)
>
> what is the process for getting patches into 6.1? Are they resubmitted
> one-by-one, or do i do a wholesale diff of hppa-specific files? There
> are about 30 patches from me that has gone into CVS since 6.1.
Something like:
$ cp src/gdb/hppa*.[hc] 61/src/gdb ; emacs 61/src/gdb/ChangeLog
For the changelog suggest both mentioning that the stuff is an import
from the mainline and list a concat of the original changelogs (minus
dates et.al.).
Most important though is:
$ emacs 61/src/gdb/NEWS 61/src/gdb/ChangeLog
where there should be a brief of how the update affects (benefits) the
user - mention a few key bug fixes for instance.
When it comes to architecture specific changes GDB is very liberal - the
worst they can do is break that architecture and presumably the person
pulling in the changes is testing it :-)
enjoy,
Andrew
PS: I've some incompatible frame changes on hold waiting for 6.1.1 to
ship - help make these imports easier.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-26 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-25 21:22 Andrew Cagney
2004-05-25 21:36 ` Randolph Chung
2004-05-25 21:47 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-05-25 21:53 ` Randolph Chung
2004-05-25 22:22 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-25 22:28 ` Randolph Chung
2004-05-26 17:15 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-05-26 18:10 ` Randolph Chung
2004-05-26 22:13 ` Manoj Iyer
2004-05-27 20:19 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-26 17:58 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-06-07 18:18 ` GDB 6.1.1 2004-05-21-gmt [not] Andrew Cagney
2004-05-26 0:08 GDB 6.1.1 2004-05-21-gmt Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-05-27 10:54 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40B4D0A9.7080104@gnu.org \
--to=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=brobecker@gnat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=randolph@tausq.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox