From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12320 invoked by alias); 5 May 2004 18:53:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12299 invoked from network); 5 May 2004 18:53:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.ut.sco.com) (216.250.130.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 May 2004 18:53:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 31701 invoked from network); 5 May 2004 18:53:32 -0000 Received: from vms.caldera.com (216.250.130.31) by mail.ut.sco.com with SMTP; 5 May 2004 18:53:32 -0000 Received: from vms.caldera.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46516A002; Wed, 5 May 2004 12:53:31 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sco.com (shrike.pdev.ca.caldera.com [132.147.65.3]) by vms.caldera.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157EEA004; Wed, 5 May 2004 12:53:22 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <409935CF.5080805@sco.com> Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 18:53:00 -0000 From: Kean Johnston Organization: The SCO Group User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stan Shebs Cc: Andrew Cagney , Michael Elizabeth Chastain , ezannoni@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com, jimb@redhat.com Subject: Re: Phasing out Dwarf 1? References: <20040505052310.A2AF64B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> <4098FAA6.9020306@gnu.org> <40990E80.4090906@sco.com> <409932A9.3040504@apple.com> In-Reply-To: <409932A9.3040504@apple.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00036.txt.bz2 > This confuses me a bit - what debugging format would you use > if Dwarf 1 were no longer available? I would have no choice but to either: 1) Change to a compiler that produced DWARF-2 or 2) Use an older version of GDB that supports DWARF-1. Both are reasonable choices for most people, the second being the least disruptive. Kean