From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3852 invoked by alias); 5 May 2004 14:31:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3844 invoked from network); 5 May 2004 14:31:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 May 2004 14:31:12 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i45EVBkI006329 for ; Wed, 5 May 2004 10:31:12 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (to-dhcp51.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.151]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i45EV7v07150; Wed, 5 May 2004 10:31:11 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B561D2B9D; Wed, 5 May 2004 10:31:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4098FAA6.9020306@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 14:31:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: ezannoni@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com, jimb@redhat.com Subject: Re: Phasing out Dwarf 1? References: <20040505052310.A2AF64B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> In-Reply-To: <20040505052310.A2AF64B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00033.txt.bz2 > That's just gcc. It doesn't include systems with non-gcc compilers > that still emit dwarf-1. I don't know if any such systems exist. If you installed operating system X, including the vendor compiler, and typed `cc -g ..` would the debug format be dwarf-1? Of those, how many do we still support. > So if somebody has an i386-dg-dgux system, they could still be > using gcc 3.2.2 and dwarf-1. Or i686-unknown-sco3.2v5 and > gcc 2.95.3. Or sparc-*-sysv4* and gcc 2.95.3. > > I'm not sure what the thrust of your question is so I don't know > if this is the info that you're looking for. Andrew