From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2336 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2004 22:52:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2307 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2004 22:52:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2004 22:52:32 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C0582B92; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 17:52:26 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <406362AA.1040502@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 14:43:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stan Shebs Cc: Jason Molenda , binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Retire the MPW support from toplevel and binutils References: <406239C8.6020106@apple.com> <4062FB6D.5060108@gnu.org> <40635448.1000902@gnu.org> <4063585E.9090101@apple.com> <40635C52.5020102@gnu.org> <40635F0C.1050200@apple.com> In-Reply-To: <40635F0C.1050200@apple.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00272.txt.bz2 >> Stan, what's the urgency? Why not wait until GDB 6.1 and BINUTILS 1.? are released as that is obviously going to make everyones life easier. What's that, a few extra weeks? > > > I have a bit of time available now, no guarantees about the future. > Seeing as how the support has long been gone from GDB proper, I'm > totally mystified as to why these files even matter to anybody one way > or the other, let alone how keeping them makes "everyones life > easier"?. Am I missing a scripting/packaging dependency or > something? Who knows whats going on with scripting/packaging. I'm more than happy to do this for you in a few weeks once GDB and BINUTILS are out of the way. Andrew