From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16184 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2004 15:43:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16176 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2004 15:43:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Mar 2004 15:43:05 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C372B92; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:43:06 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4059C38A.5040902@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:43:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "A.Ramesh" Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Regarding 'set architecture References: <000001c40caf$ccd90000$7b00a8c0@acme> In-Reply-To: <000001c40caf$ccd90000$7b00a8c0@acme> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00171.txt.bz2 > Hi, > > We have added new target in simulator. But the target will not reflect > for the disassembler. > If we are setting the architecture name explicitly using 'set > architecture ', then the disassembler works for my > new target. If I invoke the command 'set architecture ', my new > target doesn't display in the supported architecture name list. Why we > have to set the architecture explicitly ? Is this GDB design or any > changes required in disassembler configuration to support the current > target? GDB gets its list of known arch:mach pairs from BFD. If your machine doesn't appear I'd start by checking BFD. Andrew