From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13499 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2004 16:20:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13492 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2004 16:20:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.129.200.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Mar 2004 16:20:42 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB532B98; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 11:20:41 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <404C9D59.4070203@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 16:20:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Corinna Vinschen , Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: What is gdb.base/structs2.exp actually testing? References: <20040308144154.GE11141@cygbert.vinschen.de> In-Reply-To: <20040308144154.GE11141@cygbert.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00048.txt.bz2 > the subject already contains the question. What is the structs2 test > good for? It's really not clear to me. There's a PR 13536 mentioned > in the first line of structs2.c but this is a PRMS number and searching > the gdb-patches archive didn't give me any useful hint. Is PRMS still > accessible somewhere? FYI, PRMS in this context is a reference to Cygnus's old old _internal_ bug database :-(. Those references need to be deleted. Daniel wrote: > Personally, that seems like a very dubious optimization for GCC to be > making at -O0... we can't change the calling convention at -O0, so the > arguments are there, so GCC ought to emit enough information for us to > find them. You didn't mention what compiler version you're testing > with... yes. Andrew