From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: get_frame_func() VS get_frame_id().code
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 16:06:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4048A562.5020106@gnu.org> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1445 bytes --]
Hello,
The current get_frame_func() is implemented as roughly:
fi->prev_func.addr = get_pc_function_start (addr_in_block);
Unfortunatly this isn't valid for a signal trampoline (or at least the
evil ones that consist of random bytes in a random memory location).
For such trampolines, get_pc_function_start [rightly] fails and "func"
ends up as zero -- not good -- a properly constructed frame ID requires
non-zero code and stack addresses.
Fortunatly, with a bit of extra instruction pattern matching, it is
possible to identify the first instruction of a signal trampoline and
hence correctly compute the trampolines "func" address. Similarly, more
normal frames can determine the function start using the symbol table's
get_pc_function_start.
Consequently, I think there should be mechanism for obtaining both the
symbol table and frame's idea of a function's start address. This would
mean introducing:
- get_frame_func_by_symtab
Returns the function start according to the symbol table. Much of the
existing code (especially unwinders) would need to be updated to use this.
- get_frame_func_by_id
Returns the function start based on the frame ID. With the first change
made, this could even be called get_frame_func.
I've attached a proof-of-concept and as such the patch points to a
number of additional changes (the most obvious being the need for a
"tramp-frame" that generalizes the technique).
Andrew
[-- Attachment #2: diffs --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 6297 bytes --]
2004-03-03 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
* ppcnbsd-tdep.c: Include "objfiles.h", "trad-frame.h", and
"frame-unwind.h".
(struct ppcnbsd_sigtramp_cache, ppcnbsd_sigtramp_this_id)
(ppcnbsd_sigtramp_prev_register, ppcnbsd_sigtramp_cache)
(ppcnbsd_sigtramp_sniffer, ppcnbsd_sigtramp_unwind)
(ppcnbsd_sigtramp_start, ppcnbsd_init_abi): Implement a NetBSD/PPC
signal trampline unwinder, register.
Index: ppcnbsd-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/ppcnbsd-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -r1.11 ppcnbsd-tdep.c
--- ppcnbsd-tdep.c 10 Nov 2003 22:47:28 -0000 1.11
+++ ppcnbsd-tdep.c 5 Mar 2004 15:39:35 -0000
@@ -26,6 +26,9 @@
#include "breakpoint.h"
#include "value.h"
#include "osabi.h"
+#include "trad-frame.h"
+#include "frame-unwind.h"
+#include "objfiles.h"
#include "ppc-tdep.h"
#include "ppcnbsd-tdep.h"
@@ -227,6 +230,165 @@
readbuf, writebuf);
}
+/* Given the NEXTE frame, examine the instructions at and around this
+ frame's resume address (aka PC) to see of they look like a signal
+ trampoline. Return the address of the trampolines first
+ instruction, or zero if it isn't a signal trampoline. */
+
+static CORE_ADDR
+ppcnbsd_sigtramp_start (struct frame_info *next_frame)
+{
+ static const long sigtramp[] = {
+ 0x38610018, /* addi r3,r1,24 */
+ 0x38000127, /* li r0,295 */
+ 0x44000002, /* sc */
+ 0x38000001, /* li r0,1 */
+ 0x44000002, /* sc */
+ };
+ CORE_ADDR pc = frame_pc_unwind (next_frame);
+ long pcinsn;
+ int pci;
+
+ /* Fetch the instruction at PC and try to find it in the
+ sigtramp. */
+ pcinsn = read_memory_unsigned_integer (pc, 4);
+ for (pci = 0; pci < ARRAY_SIZE (sigtramp); pci++)
+ {
+ if (sigtramp[pci] == pcinsn)
+ {
+ /* With the PC's instruction found, check that the remaining
+ instructions also match. Because there are two SC's in
+ the above, this part may need to be executed more than
+ once. */
+ int i;
+ long insn;
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE (sigtramp); i++)
+ {
+ if (i == pci) continue;
+ insn = read_memory_unsigned_integer (pc + 4 * (i - pci), 4);
+ if (sigtramp[i] != insn)
+ break;
+ }
+ /* All matched, return the start of the signal
+ trampoline. */
+ if (i >= ARRAY_SIZE (sigtramp))
+ return pc - 4 * pci;
+ }
+ }
+ /* Not a sigtramp. */
+ return 0;
+}
+
+struct ppcnbsd_sigtramp_cache
+{
+ struct frame_id this_id;
+ CORE_ADDR this_base;
+ struct trad_frame_saved_reg *saved_regs;
+};
+
+static struct ppcnbsd_sigtramp_cache *
+ppcnbsd_sigtramp_cache (struct frame_info *next_frame, void **this_cache)
+{
+ CORE_ADDR offset;
+ int i;
+ struct ppcnbsd_sigtramp_cache *cache;
+ struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_frame_arch (next_frame);
+ struct gdbarch_tdep *tdep = gdbarch_tdep (gdbarch);
+
+ if ((*this_cache) != NULL)
+ return (*this_cache);
+ cache = FRAME_OBSTACK_ZALLOC (struct ppcnbsd_sigtramp_cache);
+ (*this_cache) = cache;
+ cache->saved_regs = trad_frame_alloc_saved_regs (next_frame);
+
+ cache->this_base = frame_unwind_register_unsigned (next_frame, SP_REGNUM);
+ offset = cache->this_base + 0x18 + 2 * tdep->wordsize;
+ for (i = 0; i < 32; i++)
+ {
+ int regnum = i + tdep->ppc_gp0_regnum;
+ cache->saved_regs[regnum].addr = offset;
+ offset += tdep->wordsize;
+ }
+ cache->saved_regs[tdep->ppc_lr_regnum].addr = offset;
+ offset += tdep->wordsize;
+ cache->saved_regs[tdep->ppc_cr_regnum].addr = offset;
+ offset += tdep->wordsize;
+ cache->saved_regs[tdep->ppc_xer_regnum].addr = offset;
+ offset += tdep->wordsize;
+ cache->saved_regs[tdep->ppc_ctr_regnum].addr = offset;
+ offset += tdep->wordsize;
+ cache->saved_regs[PC_REGNUM].addr = offset; /* SRR0? */
+ offset += tdep->wordsize;
+
+ /* Construct the frame ID using the function start. */
+ {
+ CORE_ADDR func = frame_func_unwind (next_frame);
+ if (func == 0)
+ cache->this_id = frame_id_build (cache->this_base,
+ ppcnbsd_sigtramp_start (next_frame));
+ else
+ cache->this_id = frame_id_build (cache->this_base, func);
+ }
+
+ return cache;
+}
+
+static void
+ppcnbsd_sigtramp_this_id (struct frame_info *next_frame, void **this_cache,
+ struct frame_id *this_id)
+{
+ struct ppcnbsd_sigtramp_cache *info = ppcnbsd_sigtramp_cache (next_frame,
+ this_cache);
+ (*this_id) = info->this_id;
+}
+
+static void
+ppcnbsd_sigtramp_prev_register (struct frame_info *next_frame,
+ void **this_cache,
+ int regnum, int *optimizedp,
+ enum lval_type *lvalp, CORE_ADDR *addrp,
+ int *realnump, void *valuep)
+{
+ struct ppcnbsd_sigtramp_cache *info = ppcnbsd_sigtramp_cache (next_frame,
+ this_cache);
+ trad_frame_prev_register (next_frame, info->saved_regs, regnum,
+ optimizedp, lvalp, addrp, realnump, valuep);
+}
+
+static const struct frame_unwind ppcnbsd_sigtramp_unwind =
+{
+ SIGTRAMP_FRAME,
+ ppcnbsd_sigtramp_this_id,
+ ppcnbsd_sigtramp_prev_register
+};
+
+static const struct frame_unwind *
+ppcnbsd_sigtramp_sniffer (struct frame_info *next_frame)
+{
+ CORE_ADDR pc = frame_pc_unwind (next_frame);
+ char *name;
+ find_pc_partial_function (pc, &name, NULL, NULL);
+ if (name != NULL)
+ {
+ /* A modern unwinder (post 1.6.x) that lives in libc. It can be
+ identified by its name. */
+ if (nbsd_pc_in_sigtramp (pc, name))
+ return &ppcnbsd_sigtramp_unwind;
+ else
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ if (find_pc_section (pc) != NULL)
+ /* Old style signal trampolines (which lived on the stack) never
+ had a section, so if one is found, it can't be a sigtramp. */
+ return NULL;
+ /* Examine instructions around PC to see if they match the sigtramp,
+ if they do ok. */
+ if (ppcnbsd_sigtramp_start (next_frame) != 0)
+ return &ppcnbsd_sigtramp_unwind;
+ else
+ return NULL;
+}
+
static void
ppcnbsd_init_abi (struct gdbarch_info info,
struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
@@ -237,6 +399,7 @@
set_gdbarch_return_value (gdbarch, ppcnbsd_return_value);
set_solib_svr4_fetch_link_map_offsets (gdbarch,
nbsd_ilp32_solib_svr4_fetch_link_map_offsets);
+ frame_unwind_append_sniffer (gdbarch, ppcnbsd_sigtramp_sniffer);
}
void
next reply other threads:[~2004-03-05 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-05 16:06 Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-03-07 0:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-09 2:54 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4048A562.5020106@gnu.org \
--to=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox