From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-17457-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 32730 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2004 03:22:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 32634 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2004 03:22:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO msrvr.intellambda.com) (207.5.82.234)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Feb 2004 03:22:31 -0000
Message-ID: <403EB813.90408@intellambda.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 03:22:00 -0000
From: Albert Ho <alberth@intellambda.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: gdb-6.0/gdb/gdbserver/target.c::set_desired_inferior()
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00409.txt.bz2

Should gdb-6.0/gdb/gdbserver/target.c::set_desired_inferior() always 
succeed when dealing with 's' in main?

I run into a problem when a thread is not found in 
set_desired_inferior(), causing &status to become some bogus addr and 
hence gdbserve segv.

Thanks