From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19069 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2004 15:54:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19057 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2004 15:54:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.129.200.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Feb 2004 15:54:00 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A1C92B92; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:53:57 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <403CC515.4090201@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:54:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , roland@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: remote protocol support for TARGET_OBJECT_AUXV References: <200402242321.i1ONLTPE001897@magilla.sf.frob.com> <20040225143415.GA18298@nevyn.them.org> <9003-Wed25Feb2004171540+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> In-Reply-To: <9003-Wed25Feb2004171540+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00363.txt.bz2 >>Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 09:34:16 -0500 >>> From: Daniel Jacobowitz >> >>>> > >>>> > Does anybody know what's the story here, why ENN is printed and what >>>> > it should be? Is this perhaps a bug? >> >>> >>> It predates my work with gdbserver. My guess is that someone saw ENN >>> in the manual, realized that GDB didn't parse the error numbers to do >>> anything useful, and decided not to bother coming up with some. > > > If so, I think we should simply remove the ENN thing (and update the > docs accordingly). It doesn't make sense, IMHO, to print a string > that has no useful meaning. Er, no. "Enn" as a reply packet is a fundamental part of the protocol and can't be removed. Whats lacking is the formal specification of its contents. For the moment I'd leave that part of roland's doco as is. Andrew