From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5429 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2004 05:12:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5389 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2004 05:12:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.157.170.238) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Feb 2004 05:12:02 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80202B92; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 00:11:50 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <403C2E96.8050409@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 05:12:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: drow@false.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Branch created for inter-compilation-unit references References: <20040225035109.83E2F4B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> In-Reply-To: <20040225035109.83E2F4B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00358.txt.bz2 >>Merging the branch may have to wait until after GDB 6.1. > > > This process is looking like gcc, which is probably an improvement. > Develop on the branch; verify no regressions; then merge. Careful, GCC is currently faceing an SSA mega-merge. A strategy, reminiscent of the HP merge, is not one we want to encourage here. Haveing said that short lived branches for experimentation are a good idea. Andrew