From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28202 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2004 00:35:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28193 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2004 00:35:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.129.200.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Feb 2004 00:35:17 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8272B92; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 19:35:15 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <403BEDC3.3040704@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 00:35:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, r6144 , mec.gnu@mindspring.com Subject: Re: Branch created for inter-compilation-unit references References: <20040221200814.GA28652@nevyn.them.org> <20040225001850.GA24036@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20040225001850.GA24036@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00349.txt.bz2 > I will start submitting preliminary patches, those which can also act > as bug-fixes or optimizations to the current dwarf2 code, tonight or > tomorrow. Merging the branch may have to wait until after GDB 6.1. > Personally, I'd love for it to be included, since the sooner we release > a GDB that can understand this data the sooner GCC can emit it by > default; but I want at least some more testing on the branch before > I suggest that. My timing for this project was somewhat unfortunate. Er, given that GCC 3.4 branch is emiting DW_OP_piece, isn't that more urgent? Andrew