From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16074 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2004 23:23:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16039 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2004 23:23:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO msrvr.intellambda.com) (207.5.82.234) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Feb 2004 23:23:16 -0000 Message-ID: <4035456B.6090001@intellambda.com> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:23:00 -0000 From: Albert Ho MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: working version of gdb(x86) and gdbserver(ppc)? References: <403520CD.3020800@intellambda.com> <20040219230535.GA24200@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20040219230535.GA24200@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00260.txt.bz2 Thanks Daniel. One more question: do strace suppose to show exactly the same library opened? I notice gdb open("/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1", O_RDONLY) = 3 but gdbserver open("/lib/tls/libpthread.so.0", O_RDONLY) = 9 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:47:09PM -0800, Albert Ho wrote: > > >>Hi, >> I wonder if anyone out there can share their remote debugging setup >>config that works. >>The host is x86(P4). >>The target is ppc(8270). >> Info from kernel version, gcc version, libc version, pthread library >>version is appreciated. >> >> I tried to have gdb and gdbserver between 2 identical machine(RH9, >>x86) without luck. >>Same result as with RH9's gdb and gdb 6.0 pulled from >>www.gnu.org/software/gdb. >> >> > >The problem you are seeing on RH9 is the fact that gdbserver does not >yet support NPTL. That probably will not affect your PPC 8270 setup. > > >