From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-17278-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 853 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2004 20:18:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 833 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2004 20:17:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.129.200.20)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Feb 2004 20:17:59 -0000
Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5A47E2B92; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:17:53 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4033C871.50003@gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:18:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Close all [most] SPARC PRs?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00230.txt.bz2

Hello,

Given that the SPARC code has been effectively rewritten, should all the 
old sparc PRs be closed?  I think so.

Andrew