From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18795 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2004 20:14:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18788 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2004 20:14:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.129.200.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Feb 2004 20:14:32 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE45A2B92; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:14:30 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <40327626.4090805@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 20:14:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Johnston Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Pending breakpoints and scripts References: <4027E74B.6090805@gnu.org> <20040209223227.GA7344@nevyn.them.org> <40294BA1.3020906@gnu.org> <20040210222616.GA32636@nevyn.them.org> <402A3CBB.1060508@gnu.org> <20040211144755.GA487@nevyn.them.org> <40326A70.8050601@gnu.org> <20040217193118.GA31755@nevyn.them.org> <40326DD9.8030807@gnu.org> <20040217194114.GA32400@nevyn.them.org> <4032747D.3080708@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00209.txt.bz2 > I agree you have to indicate a yes/no question. Would it be clearer to add square brackets around the default in each case ([y] or n) vs (y or [n])? This is closer to the old query which was (y or n). That appears to work. " (y or n) [n]: " is getting too long. Andrew