From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-17250-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 25533 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2004 19:39:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 25513 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2004 19:39:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.129.200.20)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Feb 2004 19:39:06 -0000
Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 688162B92; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 14:39:05 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <40326DD9.8030807@gnu.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 19:39:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: "J. Johnston" <jjohnstn@redhat.com>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Pending breakpoints and scripts
References: <4027E74B.6090805@gnu.org> <20040209223227.GA7344@nevyn.them.org> <40294BA1.3020906@gnu.org> <20040210222616.GA32636@nevyn.them.org> <402A3CBB.1060508@gnu.org> <20040211144755.GA487@nevyn.them.org> <40326A70.8050601@gnu.org> <20040217193118.GA31755@nevyn.them.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00202.txt.bz2

> On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 02:24:32PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
>> >The real problem here is with batch scripts, the change breaks existing 
> 
>> >>script behavior (which is never a good thing).
>> >>
>> >>How about this, we introduce:
>> >>	nquery()
>> >>	yquery()
>> >>where the default (batch mode, and when return is pressed is n/y 
>> >>respectively).  We'd need the language police to look over the interface 
>> >>but should otherwize be ok.
> 
>> >
>> >
>> >Works for me.
> 
>> 
>> Lets see if we can pin down the interface (adding JeffJ to the CC list):
>> 
>> nquery("A question?")
>> 
>> 	A question? [n]:
>> 
>> 	- press return => implied "n"
>> 	- batch mode => implied "n"
> 
> 
> How would you feel about "[n/y]"?  Otherwise, I like this.

As in?