From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28267 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2004 22:38:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28255 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2004 22:38:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.129.200.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Feb 2004 22:38:28 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2022B92; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 17:38:28 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <40280BE4.2010003@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 22:38:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Pending breakpoints and scripts References: <20040209222738.3E6D34B363@berman.michael-chastain.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00085.txt.bz2 > Thoughts? > > > You might not agree with this thought ... push back the branch cut until > there haven't been any new "breakpoint pending" issues surfaced for a > week. > > (Kind of a brutal thought, I know) Well, looking at the math: - I post the enable tui patch today (...) - wait a week - I commit the enable tui patch (which will make a mess) - wait a week - branch that puts the branch at ~22. I think enabling the TUI will make this breakpoint stuff look like a ripple. (I'm obviously going to have to commit the TUI stuff earlier :-/) Andrew